20TH
INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF HISTORICAL SCIENCES
(SYDNEY,
3 July - 9 July, 2005)
SPECIALISED
THEMES(26 half-day sessions)
3.
________________________________________
A
Reassessment of Modern and Contemporary Chinese Diplomacy
KAWASHIMA,Shin(
shin@juris.hokudai.ac.jp
This paper would discuss
about the Chinese diplomatic policy toward a civilized country, even a great
power in the world in 1900-1920’s.
Until 1990’s, except for some
western and Japanese scholars, most of scholars have recognized that Chinese
diplomacy from 1900s to 1920’s doesn’t have any remarkable and significant
achievements and is called ‘weak country should not have any efficient
diplomacy.’
But through the survey for so much
amount of the Chinese diplomatic archives to be opened in Taipei, Nanjing and
Beijing, we come to be able to understand the Chinese basic diplomatic policy from last
ten years of Qing dynasty to the period of Beijing government of ROC is as
follows :
(1)
To revise and improve the unequal treaties. This means not only to revise
unequal treaties (extraterritoriality, Tariff autonomy and Most-favored nation
treatment) to much more equal ones, but also to get back lost territories,
rights, collaterals and so on, through diplomatic negotiation and civilization of
(2)
To enhance its own international status in order to improve a series of unequal
treaties and get back lost rights and territories.
And
(3)
To retain and protect its own territory and rights, and to keep unification by strengthening
the concept of National sovereignty, probably influenced by the trend of
studies of international law in US at that time. And China collected and edited
materials about its own process of losing national rights trough a series of
wars and created historical memories of its original image of glorious empire
accompanied by many neighborhood countries as lost subjected countries.
Thus
(1)Some treaties were revised to more equal
ones and new equal treaties were concluded. And the rights of no-treaty
nationals in
(2)
in the war. Also
(3)China failed to in retain of territory and
national rights ,to be deprived by Japan(21articles, Shandong rights and so
on). But
These policies were basically adopted by
KMT government. KMT government decorated it with the slogan of ‘revolutionary
diplomacy’ and penetrated into administrative detail regulation to restrain
foreign activities in
The Chinese diplomatic history has left an insufficient ‘story.’